http://www.acrobatusers.com/blogs/kfoss/2008/01/10/little-known-but-practice-tested-acrobat-8-tips-for-lawyers/ Showcasing uses & users of Acrobat & PDF Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:43:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 http://www.acrobatusers.com/blogs/kfoss/2008/01/10/little-known-but-practice-tested-acrobat-8-tips-for-lawyers/#comment-6855 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:16:15 +0000 http://www.acrobatusers.com/blogs/kfoss/2008/01/10/little-known-but-practice-tested-acrobat-8-tips-for-lawyers/#comment-6855 A good practical and useful article by Roy, but I'm a bit surprised at the tacit approval of 'refrying' a pdf to embed the Comments. I've never seen any explanation of why it is so strongly disapproved of by the 'establishment' as opposed to achieving a javascript flattening. Can anyone really 'see' any difference (as opposed to under-the-hood differences), and if flattening is so good, why is the implementation through a button left to third-party providers (eg. Windjack)? A good practical and useful article by Roy, but I’m a bit surprised at the tacit approval of ‘refrying’ a pdf to embed the Comments. I’ve never seen any explanation of why it is so strongly disapproved of by the ‘establishment’ as opposed to achieving a javascript flattening. Can anyone really ’see’ any difference (as opposed to under-the-hood differences), and if flattening is so good, why is the implementation through a button left to third-party providers (eg. Windjack)?

]]>